CLE-Net Cosmos SDK Architecture
Version: 1.0
Last Updated: 2026-02-10
Status: Design Document
Overview
CLE-Net is implemented as an application-specific blockchain using the Cosmos SDK. This architecture enables native cognitive state transitions and consensus over symbolic law evolution, without the constraints of generic blockchain platforms.
Why Cosmos SDK?
CLE-Net evaluated multiple blockchain platforms and selected Cosmos SDK for the following reasons:
✅ Advantages
Application-Specific State Machines: Cosmos treats blockchains as application-specific state machines, which is exactly what CLE-Net needs
Custom State Machine: Full control over cognitive state transitions, CCS encoding, and law lifecycle
Mature Consensus: Tendermint BFT provides proven Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus
Modular Design: Easy to design custom modules for cognitive, laws, and consensus
Research-Friendly: The ecosystem respects research-grade projects
IBC Interoperability: Future-proof with Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol
Not EVM-Centric: No gas metering or financial assumptions
❌ Rejected Alternatives
Ethereum L2: EVM is a terrible fit for cognitive state machines; everything is gas-metered
Lightweight P2P: No economic security; weak Sybil resistance
Custom Chain: Years of engineering; massive attack surface; only viable after CLE-Net proves itself
Substrate: Technically excellent but steep learning curve; Rust-heavy limits contributor pool
Architecture Diagram
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ CLE-Net Application │
│ (Cosmos SDK-based Chain) │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ │
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Cognitive │ │ Laws │ │ Consensus │ │
│ │ Module │ │ Module │ │ Module │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ - Law Prop. │ │ - Storage │ │ - Validators │ │
│ │ - Validation │ │ - Indexing │ │ - PoC │ │
│ │ - Conflicts │ │ - Querying │ │ - Proposers │ │
│ │ - CCS Track │ │ - Evolution │ │ - Slashing │ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────┐ │
│ │ State Store │ │
│ │ (KV Database) │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────┐ │
│ │ Tendermint │ │
│ │ BFT │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────┐ │
│ │ P2P Network │ │
│ │ (libp2p) │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
│
▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ Off-Chain Processing │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ ┌──────────────┐ │
│ │ Symbol │ │ Knowledge │ │ Multi- │ │
│ │ Extraction │ │ Graph │ │ Modal │ │
│ │ │ │ │ │ │ │
│ │ - Atomizer │ │ - Graph RAG │ │ - Voice │ │
│ │ - Symbol │ │ - Temporal │ │ - Video │ │
│ │ Mapper │ │ Storage │ │ - Documents │ │
│ │ - Rule │ │ - Contradict │ │ - Images │ │
│ │ Engine │ │ Detection │ │ - Full-Duplex│ │
│ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ └──────────────┘ │
│ │ │ │ │
│ └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘ │
│ │ │
│ ┌────────▼────────┐ │
│ │ LLM / AI │ │
│ │ Inference │ │
│ └─────────────────┘ │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
Module Structure
1. Cognitive Module (core/cosmos/x/cognitive/)
Purpose: Manages cognitive laws, their lifecycle, and validation.
Components:
CognitiveKeeper: Manages state of cognitive laws, CCS, and conflict resolutionsCognitiveModule: Handles law proposal, validation, conflict detection, and resolutionMessage Types:
ProposeLawMessage: Propose a new cognitive lawValidateLawMessage: Validate a proposed lawReportConflictMessage: Report a conflict between lawsResolveConflictMessage: Resolve a conflict between lawsUpdateCCSMessage: Update a participant’s CCS
State:
laws: Map of law ID toCognitiveLawccs_scores: Map of participant ID toCognitiveContributionScoreconflicts: Map of resolution ID toConflictResolutioncontext_boundaries: Map of context to list of law IDs
2. Laws Module (core/cosmos/x/laws/)
Purpose: Provides law storage, indexing, and retrieval.
Components:
LawsKeeper: Manages law storage, indexing, and retrievalLawsModule: Handles law lifecycle, evolution, decay, and querying
Indexes:
By status:
PROPOSED,VALIDATING,ACTIVE,CONFLICTED,DEPRECATED,REVOKEDBy type:
SYMBOLIC_RULE,CONTEXT_BOUNDARY,DECISION_PATTERN,CAUSAL_RELATIONBy context: Laws grouped by context
By proposer: Laws grouped by proposer
Queries:
Get law by ID
Get laws by status
Get laws by type
Get laws by context
Get laws by proposer
Search laws by expression
Get similar laws
Get conflicting laws
Get top laws by confidence
Get recent laws
3. Consensus Module (core/cosmos/x/consensus/)
Purpose: Manages validators and Proof of Cognition (PoC) consensus.
Components:
ConsensusKeeper: Manages validators, their roles, and consensus stateConsensusModule: Handles validator registration, block proposal, and validationProofOfCognition: Implements PoC consensus mechanism
Validator Roles:
COGNITIVE_MINER: Discovers new cognitive lawsSTATE_VALIDATOR: Validates proposed lawsCONFLICT_RESOLVER: Resolves conflicts between lawsWATCHDOG: Monitors network health
State:
validators: Map of validator address toValidatorInfoactive_validators: Set of active validator addressesproposer_queue: Ordered list of proposersblock_height: Current block heightlast_block_hash: Hash of the last committed block
On-Chain State
Cognitive State Block (CSB)
The fundamental unit of CLE-Net. A CSB contains:
class CognitiveStateBlock:
block_height: int
block_hash: str
proposer_id: str
timestamp: datetime
new_laws: List[CognitiveLaw]
updated_laws: List[CognitiveLaw]
ccs_updates: List[CognitiveContributionScore]
conflict_resolutions: List[Dict]
prev_block_hash: str
Cognitive Law
A symbolic representation of a decision pattern:
class CognitiveLaw:
law_id: str
law_type: LawType
symbolic_expression: str
context: str
status: LawStatus
proposer_id: str
confidence: float
support_count: int
contradiction_count: int
evidence: List[str]
created_at: datetime
updated_at: datetime
decay_factor: float
Cognitive Contribution Score (CCS)
Measures the quality and impact of cognitive contributions:
class CognitiveContributionScore:
participant_id: str
score: float
contributions_count: int
laws_discovered: int
conflicts_resolved: int
last_updated: datetime
Validator Information
Tracks validators and their roles:
class ValidatorInfo:
validator_address: str
role: ValidatorRole
stake: float
uptime: float
laws_validated: int
conflicts_resolved: int
last_active: datetime
Consensus Mechanism
Proof of Cognition (PoC)
PoC is CLE-Net’s consensus mechanism that rewards independent discovery of cognitive laws.
Key Principles:
Independent Discovery: Laws must be discovered by multiple independent parties
Cognitive Contribution: Contributors earn CCS based on quality and impact
Consensus Validation: 2/3 supermajority required for law activation
Fork Tolerance: Temporary divergence is acceptable for research
Validation Process:
Law is proposed by a Cognitive Miner
State Validators vote on the law
If 2/3 supermajority approves, law becomes ACTIVE
If 2/3 supermajority rejects, law becomes DEPRECATED
If no supermajority, law remains in VALIDATING state
Reward Distribution:
Base reward: 100 CCS per law
Distributed among independent discoverers
Bonus for conflict resolution: +200 CCS
Tendermint BFT Integration
CLE-Net uses Tendermint BFT for block-level consensus:
Block Proposal: Current proposer creates a CSB
Pre-vote: Validators vote on the block
Pre-commit: Validators commit to the block
Commit: Block is committed to the chain
Mapping CLE-Consensus to Tendermint:
CLE-Net Concept |
Tendermint Concept |
|---|---|
Cognitive State Block |
Block |
Law Proposal |
Transaction |
Law Validation |
Transaction Execution |
CCS Update |
State Transition |
Conflict Resolution |
State Transition |
Validator |
Validator |
Proposer |
Proposer |
Off-Chain Processing
CLE-Net separates on-chain and off-chain processing:
On-Chain (Consensus)
Cognitive State Blocks (CSBs)
Law lifecycle state machine
CCS tracking
Validator voting
Off-Chain (Computation)
Symbol extraction from human interaction
Knowledge graph construction
LLM inference and reasoning
OCR and multi-modal input processing
This separation ensures:
No gas abuse for cognitive workloads
Efficient use of blockchain resources
Flexibility in AI model choice
Privacy for sensitive data
Migration Path
Phase 1: Cosmos SDK v1 (Current)
Application-specific blockchain
Native cognitive state machine
Tendermint BFT consensus
Basic PoC mechanism
Phase 2: Custom Chain (Future)
Optimized consensus for cognitive workloads
Custom state transition logic
Enhanced PoC mechanism
Improved performance
Phase 3: IBC Integration (Future)
Interoperability with other Cosmos chains
Cross-chain cognitive state sharing
Distributed cognition across networks
Security Considerations
Validator Security
Minimum stake requirement: 1000 tokens
Slashing for uptime below 50%
Role-based access control
Regular validator rotation
Law Security
Hash-based integrity verification
Status transition validation
Conflict detection and resolution
Decay mechanism for stale laws
Network Security
Tendermint BFT provides Byzantine fault tolerance
2/3 supermajority required for consensus
Fork tolerance for research flexibility
Watchdog mechanisms for anomaly detection
Performance Considerations
Throughput
Low throughput, high semantic density
Target: 1-10 blocks per second
Block size: Limited by cognitive state complexity
Latency
Block time: 1-10 seconds
Finality: ~2 block times (Tendermint)
Law activation: ~3-5 blocks
Storage
Law storage: Indexed by multiple attributes
State pruning: Deprecated laws can be pruned
Snapshot support: For state recovery
References
Next Steps
Implement Cosmos SDK module scaffolding
Define state machine and message handlers
Implement PoC consensus mechanism
Integrate with existing CLE-Net codebase
Test on local testnet
Deploy to public testnet
Security audit
Mainnet launch