CLE-Net Cosmos SDK Architecture

Version: 1.0
Last Updated: 2026-02-10
Status: Design Document

Overview

CLE-Net is implemented as an application-specific blockchain using the Cosmos SDK. This architecture enables native cognitive state transitions and consensus over symbolic law evolution, without the constraints of generic blockchain platforms.

Why Cosmos SDK?

CLE-Net evaluated multiple blockchain platforms and selected Cosmos SDK for the following reasons:

✅ Advantages

  1. Application-Specific State Machines: Cosmos treats blockchains as application-specific state machines, which is exactly what CLE-Net needs

  2. Custom State Machine: Full control over cognitive state transitions, CCS encoding, and law lifecycle

  3. Mature Consensus: Tendermint BFT provides proven Byzantine fault-tolerant consensus

  4. Modular Design: Easy to design custom modules for cognitive, laws, and consensus

  5. Research-Friendly: The ecosystem respects research-grade projects

  6. IBC Interoperability: Future-proof with Inter-Blockchain Communication protocol

  7. Not EVM-Centric: No gas metering or financial assumptions

❌ Rejected Alternatives

  • Ethereum L2: EVM is a terrible fit for cognitive state machines; everything is gas-metered

  • Lightweight P2P: No economic security; weak Sybil resistance

  • Custom Chain: Years of engineering; massive attack surface; only viable after CLE-Net proves itself

  • Substrate: Technically excellent but steep learning curve; Rust-heavy limits contributor pool

Architecture Diagram

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                     CLE-Net Application                      │
│                   (Cosmos SDK-based Chain)                   │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│                                                               │
│  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐      │
│  │   Cognitive  │  │     Laws     │  │   Consensus  │      │
│  │    Module    │  │    Module    │  │    Module    │      │
│  │              │  │              │  │              │      │
│  │ - Law Prop.  │  │ - Storage    │  │ - Validators │      │
│  │ - Validation │  │ - Indexing   │  │ - PoC        │      │
│  │ - Conflicts  │  │ - Querying   │  │ - Proposers  │      │
│  │ - CCS Track  │  │ - Evolution  │  │ - Slashing   │      │
│  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘      │
│           │                 │                 │              │
│           └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘              │
│                             │                                │
│                    ┌────────▼────────┐                       │
│                    │   State Store   │                       │
│                    │  (KV Database)  │                       │
│                    └─────────────────┘                       │
│                             │                                │
│                    ┌────────▼────────┐                       │
│                    │   Tendermint    │                       │
│                    │      BFT        │                       │
│                    └─────────────────┘                       │
│                             │                                │
│                    ┌────────▼────────┐                       │
│                    │   P2P Network   │                       │
│                    │   (libp2p)      │                       │
│                    └─────────────────┘                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘
                              │
                              ▼
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    Off-Chain Processing                      │
├─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┤
│  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐  ┌──────────────┐      │
│  │   Symbol     │  │  Knowledge   │  │   Multi-     │      │
│  │  Extraction  │  │    Graph     │  │    Modal     │      │
│  │              │  │              │  │              │      │
│  │ - Atomizer   │  │ - Graph RAG  │  │ - Voice      │      │
│  │ - Symbol     │  │ - Temporal   │  │ - Video      │      │
│  │   Mapper     │  │   Storage    │  │ - Documents  │      │
│  │ - Rule       │  │ - Contradict │  │ - Images     │      │
│  │   Engine     │  │   Detection  │  │ - Full-Duplex│      │
│  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘  └──────────────┘      │
│           │                 │                 │              │
│           └─────────────────┴─────────────────┘              │
│                             │                                │
│                    ┌────────▼────────┐                       │
│                    │   LLM / AI      │                       │
│                    │   Inference     │                       │
│                    └─────────────────┘                       │
└─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┘

Module Structure

1. Cognitive Module (core/cosmos/x/cognitive/)

Purpose: Manages cognitive laws, their lifecycle, and validation.

Components:

  • CognitiveKeeper: Manages state of cognitive laws, CCS, and conflict resolutions

  • CognitiveModule: Handles law proposal, validation, conflict detection, and resolution

  • Message Types:

    • ProposeLawMessage: Propose a new cognitive law

    • ValidateLawMessage: Validate a proposed law

    • ReportConflictMessage: Report a conflict between laws

    • ResolveConflictMessage: Resolve a conflict between laws

    • UpdateCCSMessage: Update a participant’s CCS

State:

  • laws: Map of law ID to CognitiveLaw

  • ccs_scores: Map of participant ID to CognitiveContributionScore

  • conflicts: Map of resolution ID to ConflictResolution

  • context_boundaries: Map of context to list of law IDs

2. Laws Module (core/cosmos/x/laws/)

Purpose: Provides law storage, indexing, and retrieval.

Components:

  • LawsKeeper: Manages law storage, indexing, and retrieval

  • LawsModule: Handles law lifecycle, evolution, decay, and querying

Indexes:

  • By status: PROPOSED, VALIDATING, ACTIVE, CONFLICTED, DEPRECATED, REVOKED

  • By type: SYMBOLIC_RULE, CONTEXT_BOUNDARY, DECISION_PATTERN, CAUSAL_RELATION

  • By context: Laws grouped by context

  • By proposer: Laws grouped by proposer

Queries:

  • Get law by ID

  • Get laws by status

  • Get laws by type

  • Get laws by context

  • Get laws by proposer

  • Search laws by expression

  • Get similar laws

  • Get conflicting laws

  • Get top laws by confidence

  • Get recent laws

3. Consensus Module (core/cosmos/x/consensus/)

Purpose: Manages validators and Proof of Cognition (PoC) consensus.

Components:

  • ConsensusKeeper: Manages validators, their roles, and consensus state

  • ConsensusModule: Handles validator registration, block proposal, and validation

  • ProofOfCognition: Implements PoC consensus mechanism

Validator Roles:

  • COGNITIVE_MINER: Discovers new cognitive laws

  • STATE_VALIDATOR: Validates proposed laws

  • CONFLICT_RESOLVER: Resolves conflicts between laws

  • WATCHDOG: Monitors network health

State:

  • validators: Map of validator address to ValidatorInfo

  • active_validators: Set of active validator addresses

  • proposer_queue: Ordered list of proposers

  • block_height: Current block height

  • last_block_hash: Hash of the last committed block

On-Chain State

Cognitive State Block (CSB)

The fundamental unit of CLE-Net. A CSB contains:

class CognitiveStateBlock:
    block_height: int
    block_hash: str
    proposer_id: str
    timestamp: datetime
    new_laws: List[CognitiveLaw]
    updated_laws: List[CognitiveLaw]
    ccs_updates: List[CognitiveContributionScore]
    conflict_resolutions: List[Dict]
    prev_block_hash: str

Cognitive Law

A symbolic representation of a decision pattern:

class CognitiveLaw:
    law_id: str
    law_type: LawType
    symbolic_expression: str
    context: str
    status: LawStatus
    proposer_id: str
    confidence: float
    support_count: int
    contradiction_count: int
    evidence: List[str]
    created_at: datetime
    updated_at: datetime
    decay_factor: float

Cognitive Contribution Score (CCS)

Measures the quality and impact of cognitive contributions:

class CognitiveContributionScore:
    participant_id: str
    score: float
    contributions_count: int
    laws_discovered: int
    conflicts_resolved: int
    last_updated: datetime

Validator Information

Tracks validators and their roles:

class ValidatorInfo:
    validator_address: str
    role: ValidatorRole
    stake: float
    uptime: float
    laws_validated: int
    conflicts_resolved: int
    last_active: datetime

Consensus Mechanism

Proof of Cognition (PoC)

PoC is CLE-Net’s consensus mechanism that rewards independent discovery of cognitive laws.

Key Principles:

  1. Independent Discovery: Laws must be discovered by multiple independent parties

  2. Cognitive Contribution: Contributors earn CCS based on quality and impact

  3. Consensus Validation: 2/3 supermajority required for law activation

  4. Fork Tolerance: Temporary divergence is acceptable for research

Validation Process:

  1. Law is proposed by a Cognitive Miner

  2. State Validators vote on the law

  3. If 2/3 supermajority approves, law becomes ACTIVE

  4. If 2/3 supermajority rejects, law becomes DEPRECATED

  5. If no supermajority, law remains in VALIDATING state

Reward Distribution:

  • Base reward: 100 CCS per law

  • Distributed among independent discoverers

  • Bonus for conflict resolution: +200 CCS

Tendermint BFT Integration

CLE-Net uses Tendermint BFT for block-level consensus:

  1. Block Proposal: Current proposer creates a CSB

  2. Pre-vote: Validators vote on the block

  3. Pre-commit: Validators commit to the block

  4. Commit: Block is committed to the chain

Mapping CLE-Consensus to Tendermint:

CLE-Net Concept

Tendermint Concept

Cognitive State Block

Block

Law Proposal

Transaction

Law Validation

Transaction Execution

CCS Update

State Transition

Conflict Resolution

State Transition

Validator

Validator

Proposer

Proposer

Off-Chain Processing

CLE-Net separates on-chain and off-chain processing:

On-Chain (Consensus)

  • Cognitive State Blocks (CSBs)

  • Law lifecycle state machine

  • CCS tracking

  • Validator voting

Off-Chain (Computation)

  • Symbol extraction from human interaction

  • Knowledge graph construction

  • LLM inference and reasoning

  • OCR and multi-modal input processing

This separation ensures:

  • No gas abuse for cognitive workloads

  • Efficient use of blockchain resources

  • Flexibility in AI model choice

  • Privacy for sensitive data

Migration Path

Phase 1: Cosmos SDK v1 (Current)

  • Application-specific blockchain

  • Native cognitive state machine

  • Tendermint BFT consensus

  • Basic PoC mechanism

Phase 2: Custom Chain (Future)

  • Optimized consensus for cognitive workloads

  • Custom state transition logic

  • Enhanced PoC mechanism

  • Improved performance

Phase 3: IBC Integration (Future)

  • Interoperability with other Cosmos chains

  • Cross-chain cognitive state sharing

  • Distributed cognition across networks

Security Considerations

Validator Security

  • Minimum stake requirement: 1000 tokens

  • Slashing for uptime below 50%

  • Role-based access control

  • Regular validator rotation

Law Security

  • Hash-based integrity verification

  • Status transition validation

  • Conflict detection and resolution

  • Decay mechanism for stale laws

Network Security

  • Tendermint BFT provides Byzantine fault tolerance

  • 2/3 supermajority required for consensus

  • Fork tolerance for research flexibility

  • Watchdog mechanisms for anomaly detection

Performance Considerations

Throughput

  • Low throughput, high semantic density

  • Target: 1-10 blocks per second

  • Block size: Limited by cognitive state complexity

Latency

  • Block time: 1-10 seconds

  • Finality: ~2 block times (Tendermint)

  • Law activation: ~3-5 blocks

Storage

  • Law storage: Indexed by multiple attributes

  • State pruning: Deprecated laws can be pruned

  • Snapshot support: For state recovery

References

Next Steps

  1. Implement Cosmos SDK module scaffolding

  2. Define state machine and message handlers

  3. Implement PoC consensus mechanism

  4. Integrate with existing CLE-Net codebase

  5. Test on local testnet

  6. Deploy to public testnet

  7. Security audit

  8. Mainnet launch